Extinction has long been seen as nature’s final verdict—once a species disappears from the Earth, it’s gone forever. Or is it?

In recent years, an idea that once belonged to science fiction has edged into the realm of scientific possibility: de-extinction, the process of resurrecting extinct species using cutting-edge biotechnology. At the forefront of this conversation is one of the most iconic ice age animals—the woolly mammoth.

Towering, shaggy, and cold-adapted, the woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) roamed the tundras of Europe, Asia, and North America for hundreds of thousands of years before going extinct roughly 4,000 years ago. Now, thanks to ancient DNA and advances in gene-editing technology, scientists are asking a bold question: Can we bring the mammoth back to life?

The Science Behind De-Extinction

De-extinction isn’t about cloning a mammoth from frozen remains—DNA degrades over time, and no intact mammoth cells have ever been recovered. Instead, researchers are using a close living relative—the Asian elephant—as a starting point.

The most promising method involves CRISPR-Cas9, a gene-editing tool often described as “molecular scissors.” Scientists can take DNA from mammoth remains, identify important genes responsible for cold adaptation (such as those for thick fur, fat storage, and hemoglobin function), and insert them into the genome of an Asian elephant.

The result wouldn’t be a perfect woolly mammoth—it would be a mammoth-elephant hybrid, often called a “mammophant.” The goal is to create an animal that looks and behaves like a mammoth and can survive in cold environments similar to the ones their ancestors once roamed.

Who’s Leading the Charge?

The most notable player in the mammoth revival project is Colossal Biosciences, a biotech company co-founded in 2021 by geneticist Dr. George Church and tech entrepreneur Ben Lamm. Their ambitious plan aims to produce the first mammoth hybrids within this decade.

Their mission goes beyond just scientific curiosity. They believe that reviving the mammoth—or a cold-resistant elephant—could have environmental benefits, such as restoring Pleistocene-era ecosystems and helping to combat climate change.

Rewilding the Arctic Tundra

One of the more surprising arguments for bringing back mammoths is ecological restoration. Scientists suggest that these massive herbivores once played a key role in maintaining the grasslands of the Arctic, known as the “mammoth steppe.”

Without these large grazers, the tundra has become overrun with moss and shrubs. This vegetation traps heat and contributes to the thawing of permafrost, which releases massive amounts of greenhouse gases like methane and CO₂.

By reintroducing mammoth-like creatures, researchers hope to transform the tundra back into grassland, where the animals would knock down trees, compact snow, and help reflect solar radiation back into space—potentially slowing permafrost melt and global warming.

Ethical and Practical Questions

Despite the promise, de-extinction raises serious ethical, ecological, and scientific concerns.

• Animal Welfare: Can we justify creating a genetically engineered animal when we don't yet fully understand its needs, behaviors, or risks of suffering?
• Conservation Trade-Offs: Should we spend millions of dollars reviving extinct species when thousands of existing species are endangered today?
• Ecological Impact: How would a mammoth hybrid fit into today’s ecosystems? Could it become invasive or disrupt existing wildlife?
• Surrogacy and Birth: Since Asian elephants are endangered and already under threat, using them as surrogates for mammoth hybrids could pose risks to their health and conservation.

Animal Welfare: Can we justify creating a genetically engineered animal when we don't yet fully understand its needs, behaviors, or risks of suffering?

Conservation Trade-Offs: Should we spend millions of dollars reviving extinct species when thousands of existing species are endangered today?

Ecological Impact: How would a mammoth hybrid fit into today’s ecosystems? Could it become invasive or disrupt existing wildlife?

Surrogacy and Birth: Since Asian elephants are endangered and already under threat, using them as surrogates for mammoth hybrids could pose risks to their health and conservation.

These concerns underscore the importance of transparent debate, multidisciplinary research, and strict regulatory oversight as de-extinction science progresses.

The Broader Vision of De-Extinction

The mammoth is just one of several species being considered for revival. Others include:

• The Passenger Pigeon, once a keystone species in North American forests
• The Thylacine (Tasmanian tiger), a carnivorous marsupial from Australia
• The Great Auk, a flightless seabird hunted to extinction in the 1800s

The Passenger Pigeon, once a keystone species in North American forests

The Thylacine (Tasmanian tiger), a carnivorous marsupial from Australia

The Great Auk, a flightless seabird hunted to extinction in the 1800s

Each case brings unique opportunities and challenges. But the broader vision is clear: to use synthetic biology not just to revisit the past, but to safeguard the future of biodiversity.

Conclusion: A Glimpse into Tomorrow

Whether or not we ever see herds of woolly mammoths thundering across Siberia again, the science behind de-extinction is already transforming biology. It’s helping us understand ancient DNA, improve conservation genetics, and reconsider our role in shaping Earth’s ecosystems.

De-extinction may not be about rewriting history, but rather writing a better future—one in which technology, ethics, and ecology are thoughtfully aligned.

As with all powerful tools, the question isn’t just whether we can bring back the mammoth, but whether we should—and if so, how we can do it responsibly.

Thanks for reading The Research Code’s Newsletter! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share