In an era where information is just a click away, it seems paradoxical that public engagement with scientific research and educational content is dwindling while sensational, illicit, or obscene content flourishes online. Despite the unprecedented access to scientific knowledge, people often gravitate toward viral memes, scandalous videos, and clickbait headlines. Why does scientific content, with its promise of enlightenment and progress, struggle to compete in the digital attention economy?

The answer lies at the intersection of neuroscience, psychology, and the architecture of the internet itself.

Share

1. The Brain’s Hardwired Attraction to Novelty and Sensation

From an evolutionary perspective, human brains are hardwired to prioritize novel, emotionally stimulating, and socially relevant information. This survival mechanism, which once helped humans react swiftly to threats and opportunities, is now exploited by algorithms designed to maximize engagement.

Illicit and obscene content—ranging from gossip and explicit imagery to scandalous news—triggers the brain’s reward system, releasing dopamine, the “feel-good” neurotransmitter. This immediate gratification creates a feedback loop, encouraging repeated consumption. Scientific articles, on the other hand, often demand sustained attention, critical thinking, and cognitive effort. The reward is long-term intellectual satisfaction rather than instant emotional stimulation.

As neuroscientist Dr. David Linden explains, “Our dopamine system isn’t designed to prioritize content that’s ‘good for us’—it prioritizes what’s new, exciting, and emotionally charged.”

2. Cognitive Load and the "Easier Option"

Scientific content is inherently complex. It requires readers to process new concepts, interpret data, and sometimes confront uncomfortable truths that challenge pre-existing beliefs. This cognitive load is taxing, especially in a digital environment flooded with easier alternatives.

Obscene and sensational content, by contrast, demands minimal cognitive investment. It’s designed to be consumed passively, offering immediate entertainment without requiring analysis. In a world where attention spans are shrinking—studies suggest the average attention span has dropped to 8 seconds, shorter than that of a goldfish—scientific content often loses out simply because it requires more mental effort.

3. Algorithmic Amplification of Clickbait over Substance

Social media platforms and content recommendation algorithms are not neutral. They are engineered to maximize user engagement because more engagement translates to more ad revenue. Algorithms measure engagement through likes, shares, comments, and viewing time—metrics that favor content eliciting strong emotional reactions.

Scientific articles rarely go viral because their emotional triggers are subtler and more nuanced. In contrast, a controversial video or shocking headline can instantly provoke outrage, humor, or desire—emotions that drive engagement metrics sky-high.

A 2021 study published in Nature found that misinformation and sensational content spreads six times faster than factual, educational content on platforms like Twitter. The reason? Emotional contagion—people are more likely to share content that evokes strong feelings, regardless of its factual accuracy.

4. The Problem of Scientific Communication

Science communicators face a unique challenge: translating complex research into accessible narratives without oversimplifying or distorting the truth. Unfortunately, academic writing is often dense and filled with jargon, making it inaccessible to the general public.

Moreover, the “publish or perish” culture in academia prioritizes papers in peer-reviewed journals over public outreach. This disconnect between scientists and lay audiences means that even groundbreaking discoveries often fail to reach the wider public in an engaging format.

In contrast, creators of illicit or obscene content are masters of packaging information for maximum appeal, using provocative thumbnails, sensational headlines, and emotional storytelling to capture attention within seconds.

5. Psychological Comfort Zones and Confirmation Bias

Another subtle factor is psychological comfort. People are naturally inclined to seek information that confirms their existing beliefs (confirmation bias) and avoid content that forces them to reconsider their worldview (cognitive dissonance).

Scientific content, by its very nature, often challenges assumptions, introduces uncertainty, or highlights complex problems without easy solutions. Illicit content, on the other hand, typically reinforces primal instincts, voyeuristic curiosity, or cultural taboos, making it psychologically “easier” to consume.

6. Information Overload and the Scarcity of Attention

We live in an age of information overload. Every day, individuals are bombarded with more data than they can process—from emails and notifications to endless scrolling on social feeds. Attention has become a scarce resource.

In this competitive attention economy, content that grabs eyeballs quickly wins. Scientific content, which typically requires time, reflection, and context, is at a disadvantage in the rapid-fire environment of modern media consumption.

Can Science Compete?

While these factors paint a grim picture, there is hope. Innovative science communicators are leveraging storytelling techniques, visual media, and even humor to make scientific content more engaging. Popular YouTube channels, science podcasts, and “edutainment” platforms are bridging the gap between rigorous research and public interest.

However, meaningful change also requires systemic shifts. Social media algorithms must prioritize content quality over pure engagement metrics. Educational systems should emphasize critical thinking and media literacy to prepare individuals to navigate the digital information landscape thoughtfully.

Ultimately, the battle for attention isn’t just about content—it’s about human psychology, platform incentives, and the collective choices we make as a society.

Thanks for reading The Research Code’s Newsletter! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share